Après l’approbation de la Loi Intégrale sur Violence de Genre en Espagne, des tribunaux spécifiques se sont formés. Il y a actuellement 106 tribunaux inquisitoriaux pour juger exclusivement des parents et des hommes en Espagne.
Cela n’arrive pas dans aucun pays du monde. De plus, cela n’arrive pas dès les années 30, quand les Nazis ont formé des tribunaux exclusifs pour juger seulement les Juifs.
The reason for the above mentioned juridical barbarity was the “supposed relation of power of the men on the women”, beside supposing a major harmfulness if the violence was caused by man (Sentence 95/2008, of July 24, 2008)
It seems that these ladies and gentlemen do not remember the numbers before the data is manipulated:
Or the different national and international studies, even financed by the Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality of Spain, which demonstrate that the violence is bidirectional and therefore, knock down the radical feminist theories:
Let’s remember that, in addition, art. 153.1 of the penal code “condemns with major rigor the man for the mere fact of being a man”, that is, that what is a minor offence punished with fine, if a woman commits it towards a man, is a crime punished with jail, if it is on the contrary, of a man towards a woman.
Also we must remember that, the word of the woman is enough to condemn to the man, that is, that her word is equivalent to the absolute truth.
With similar legal reasoning, tomorrow Tribunals exclusive for immigrants, poor, homosexual, black, Gipsy, Islamic, Jewish, women or politicians could be erected.
Yes, also for women, because if we use the same arguments , courts should become specific only to them because women are responsible for more deaths of children and should be typed criminally differently:
Or also exclusive Courts for politicians, since it is known by all, that the above mentioned group is the causer of the major number of cases of corruption and of documentary falsehood. Article 390 of the Penal Code about documentary falsehood:
1. The authority or government employee will be punished by sorrow of prison from three to six years, fine from six to twenty-four months and special incapacitation for time from two to six years, that, in the exercise of his functions, comet falsehood:
Altering a document in someone of his elements or requirements of essential character.
Simulating a document in everything or partly, so that it induces to mistake on his genuineness.
Supposing in an act the persons’ intervention that they have not had, or attributing those who have intervened in him declarations or manifestations different from those that they had done.
Being absent to the truth in the story of the facts.
2. There will be punished by the same sorrow to indicated in the previous paragraph the person in charge of any religious confession who incurs someone of the conducts described in the previous numbers, respect of acts and documents that could produce effect in the condition of the persons or in the civil order.
Do you know some politician condemned for the above mentioned article 390?
And you may be wondering. If all this is true ,what is the reason for this nonsense?. The answer is simple: The women’s vote and the enormous amounts of money received through subsidies: